Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore positioning and rebranding as tools for state security in global space, using the methodology of constructivism in international relations. The author hypothesizes that positioning the country as safe will be attractive only if there is a unifying factor based on the principles of consocial democracy. To achieve this purpose, the authors used several scientific approaches and methods: constructivism as a scientific paradigm; dialectical method; content analysis, and comparison. The article covers the following issues: Positioning and rebranding in modern conditions; Level of branding effectiveness in Ukraine; National identity as the basis for rebranding and state security; Rebranding states in the face of new challenges and threats. The essence of the conclusions is as follows: States will choose a partner for economic cooperation under difficult conditions in terms of political risks, benefits, and costs. This trend is about renewed positioning and rebranding to facilitate decisions on cooperation. The effectiveness of the existing state brand depends not only on creating an attractive external picture of the country’s positioning. Without a genuine alignment of the declared brand with the internal situation of the state, the political system as a whole, the congruent of the mental construct of the main political structures and the social environment, the brand will not be attractive to investors and the country will remain in an unstable environment.

Highlights

  • The modern world is facing new challenges, risks, and threats

  • Rapid changes in the world and crisis conditions are forcing states to reassess the strategy of interaction in the international arena

  • Ideological factors motivating cooperation based on the congruence of political systems are beginning to fall out of favor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The modern world is facing new challenges, risks, and threats. They concern both individual states and their associations. Even the most closed societies, such as North Korea, are looking for ways to expand their influence on the most economically developed countries, thereby attracting foreign capital necessary for developing their economies. Synergetic explains such motives by the desire to increase the predictability and stability of economic development by increasing the entropy of investments and strengthening economic equilibrium within the state system. International actors tend to use not stimulating (mainly hard power methods) but motivating methods of influencing partners, allies, and opponents (soft power, smart power) It is evident in the crisis conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental and climate change. It is possible to draw certain conclusions and make recommendations on what should be done to change the current trend for the better

Methodological grounds
Positioning and rebranding in modern conditions
Level of branding effectiveness in Ukraine
National identity as the basis for rebranding and state security
Rebranding states in the face of new challenges and threats
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call