Position-specific adaptation in simple cell receptive fields of the cat striate cortex

Abstract

1. Responses of simple cells in cat striate cortex were studied with flashed light-slit stimuli. The responses to bars flashed in different positions in the receptive field were assessed quantitatively before and after periods of prolonged stimulation of one small region. This type of prolonged stimulation resulted in reduced responsivity over a limited zone within the simple cell receptive field. 2. The adaptation-induced responsivity decrement was generally confined to the receptive-field subregion that was adapted (either ON or OFF). Prolonged stimulation within an ON region did not usually result in adaptation effects that spread into neighboring OFF regions. Furthermore, the adaptation-induced response decrement did not necessarily spread throughout the subregion in which the adapting stimulus was presented. The adaptation effects from prolonged stimulation at a single receptive-field position spread throughout the subregion in nearly one-half of the 25 cells examined for position-specific adaptation. Another subpopulation of neurons (n = 12) displayed adaptation effects that spread through only one-half of the subregion, whereas in two neurons the spread of the adaptation effect was even more restricted and encompassed only one-fourth of the subregion. 3. The spread of adaptation was not systematically related to the size of the stimulus presented, the size of the receptive field, or the magnitude of the adaptation-induced response decrements but was significantly correlated with the spatial wavelength of the cell (the reciprocal of the cell's preferred spatial frequency) and with the size of the subregion in which the adapting stimulus was presented. Cells with large receptive-field subregions and long wave-lengths showed adaptation effects that spread further than those of cells with small subregions. 4. The adaptation effects from repeated stimulation at a single receptive-field position did not spread symmetrically across the receptive field, and the preferred direction of motion for a given cell indicated the direction of the asymmetric spread of the adaptation. Receptive-field positions that would be stimulated by a light slit originating at the point of adaptation and moving in the preferred direction (preferred side) showed greater adaptation-induced response decrements than did receptive-field positions that would be stimulated by a light slit moving in the opposite direction from the point of adaptation (nonpreferred side). There was significant enhancement of responses at some receptive-field positions on the nonpreferred side of the point of adaptation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)