Abstract
Tarallo (1993) proposes that the turn of the 20th century is a landmark in the history of Brazilian Portuguese (BP), with the emergence of a Brazilian grammar different from the European Portuguese one specially in relation to the preference for lexical subjects, instead of null pronominal subjects and a strict Subject-Verb order (Tarallo, 1993). BP has been analyzed as a partially pro-drop language, in which the third person singular null subject is interpreted as an arbitrary subject (Holmberg, 2006, Cavalcante, 2007). One of the consequences of this change is that subjects are preferably placed before verbs, thus, it is possible to affirm that in BP VS order is restricted to unaccusative sentences. In this paper, we analyze the subject position in a sample of private letters which are part of the Corpus Compartilhado Diacronico: Cartas Pessoais brasileiras (Shared diachronic corpus: Brazilian private letters) http://www.letras.ufrj.br/laborhistorico/). It is a sample of letters written between the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, exchanged between couples and/or among children, from the following collections: Ottoni; Oswaldo Cruz (1889-1915); Affonso Penna; Pedreira Ferraz Magalhaes and Jayme-Maria. The main hypothesis of the study is that it is possible to detect grammar competition (Kroch, 1989) between the correspondents regarding the position of the subject, mainly related to the social role of the writers in question. As they are couples correspondence, even in the nineteenth century, we can see in the women's letters a pattern of VS order very similar to the current BP pattern: they are restricted to unaccusative and VS constructions; while in the letters written by men, we found different patterns of VS order. This can be explained by historical contingencies that differentiate, as we can see, the configuration of BP grammar in texts written from the nineteenth century on: through the nineteenth century until the mid-twentieth century the role of women in Brazil is restricted to household chores, whereas the men had not only the role of the provider, but in the case of our correspondents, a senator, doctor, president role. In this context, we believe that in women's letters we will find patterns closer to current BP than in men's letters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.