Abstract
For economic systematic reviews, there is currently no agreed-upon method to obtain a pooled economic effect size. The hierarchical decision matrix enables a visual summary of empirical economic studies, but it does not consider study precision or quality. We extended the hierarchical decision matrix with a novel weighted scoring system (termed dominance ranking score) to incorporate useful information of a study design, in order to determine dominance levels.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
