Abstract

BackgroundDemonstration of deposits by non-invasive methods is important especially for organs difficult to sample in amyloidosis. Transient elastography (fibroscan) is a diagnostic method being used to measure liver stiffness (LS) in different chronic liver diseases.ObjectivesWe herein aimed to test the place of fibroscan method for detecting increased LS associated with amyloid deposition in patients (pts) with amyloidosis.MethodsSix categories of pts enrolled into this cross-sectional study; AA amyloidosis (AA-a), AL amyloidosis (AL-a), Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) pts without amyloidosis, cirrhotic chronic liver disease, non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) and healthy controls (HC). LS assessment by fibroscan were categorized as normal for kPa<7, significant stiffness for kPa≥7, advanced stiffness for kPa≥9.5 and kPa≥F4 stiffness. FIB-4 and APRI scores were calculated for each patient when they indicated chronic liver disease. Pts with known chronic liver disease and viral hepatitis excluded from amyloidosis and FMF groups.ResultsA total of 165 pts (AA-a, n=65; AL-a, n=15; FMF, n=20; cirrhotic pts, n=16; CHB, n=22; HC, n=27) constituted the study group. Average age was higher in the AL-a group compared to others. Median LS was highest in cirrhotic pts, and it was also higher in AA-a and AL-a pts compared to FMF and HC. Median LS was numerically higher in AL-a compared to AA-a, but it did not reach statistical significance. Median LS was also higher in FMF pts compared to HC. FIB-4 and APRI scores were lower compared to cirrhotic patients in AA-a and AL-a. ALP levels were higher in AA-a and AL-a groups compared to FMF, CHB and HC. FIB-4 and APRI scores, ALP and GGT levels were correlated with LS both in AA-a (r=0.534***,r=0.485***,r=0.437***, r=0.506***) and, AL-a (r=0.536*, 0.579*, r=0.645*, r=0.752**) and FMF-AA (r=0.584***, r=0.566***,r=0.322*, r=0.306*; *p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.5) groups.Higher patient age, age at diagnosis of amylodosis, FIB-4 and LS scores, ALP levels, non-FMF causes of AA were associated with hepatic AA amyloid involvement in biopsy-proven pts. A cut-off value 12.05 kPa of LS provided 100% sensitivity and 85.5% specificity (LR=6.9, AUC=0.901, 95% CI 0.81-0.99) for pts with AA-a.ConclusionIn our single center cohort, we showed a higher median LS by fibroscan in both AL-a and AA-a pts compared to CHB, FMF and HC. It was thought to be that fibroscan may be useful in detecting hepatic amyloid involvement.Table 1.AA-a (n=65)FMF (n=20)AL-a (n=15)Cirrhosis (n=16)Chronic Hepatitis B (non-cirrhotic) (n=22)HC (n=27)p1p2p3p4p5p6Age (years)*46 (19)42.5(13)58 (16)49 (15)45 (21)45 (23)0.40.30.80.50.80.002Gender (n, %)Male38 (59)10 (50)6 (40)10 (62.5)13 (59)17 (55)0.50.810.70.70.2Female27 (41.5)10 (50)9 (60)6 (37.5)9 (40.9)14 (45.2)Diabetes Mellitus (n, %)5 (8)2 (11)2 (13)3 (15)2 (13)3 (10)0.70.60.40.80.90.6Body Mass Index (kg/m2) *25.7 (1.4)25.6 (5.4)24.8 (3.6)26.7 (6.7)25.5 (7)26 (5.7)0.90.410.70.70.3Liver stiffness (kPa)*6.7 (5.6)6.45 (2.7)9.8 (12)26.7 (22)5.7 (5)4.9 (1.6)<0.001<0.0010.03<0.001<0.0010.16Significant stiffness (kPa≥7)31 (48)11 (55)8 (58)16 (100)4 (18)2 (6.5)0.4<0.0010.012<0.001<0.0010.6Advanced stiffness (kPa≥9.5)17 (26)4 (20)7 (50)16 (100)3 (14)00.4<0.0010.20.0010.020.1S4 stiffness (kPa≥12.5)10 (15)05 (36)16 (100)2 (9)00.057<0.0010.40.020.1FIB-4 score0.97 (0.9)0.76 (0.56)1.3 (0.95)2.5 (3.4)0.85 (0.8)0.7 (0.5)<0.001<0.0010.40.0050.60.1APRI score*0.25 (0.2)0.26 (0.2)0.24 (0.2)0.77 (1.3)0.22 (0.2)0.16 (0.08)<0.001<0.0010.30.0020.020.4ALP (U/L)*97 (65)79 (55)103 (54)79 (126)76 (39)67 (22)<0.0010.50.002<0.0010.0020.7GGT (U/L)*18 (18)17 (26)24 (61)24 (51)16 (14)14 (14)0.070.20.20.070.20.08p1: AA-a and FMFp2: AA-a and cirrhosisp3: AA-a and chronic liver diseasep4: AA-a and HCp5: FMF and HCp6: AA-a and AL-a*Median, interquartile of rangeDisclosure of InterestsNone declared

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call