Abstract

BackgroundWhile some individual dietary nutrients/components have been shown to be associated with knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression, the associations of the dietary inflammatory index (DII), which reflects the overall inflammatory potential of a diet, with MRI-detected structural changes and pain have not been investigated.ObjectivesThis longitudinal study aimed to determine whether DII scores are associated with knee structural changes and pain over a 10.7-year follow-up in community-dwelling older adults.MethodsThis study utilised the data from a prospective population-based cohort study (mean age 63 years, 51% women) in which 1,099, 875, 768 and 563 participants completed assessments at baseline, 2.6, 5.1 and 10.7 years, respectively. T1-weighted or T2-weighted MRI of the right knee was performed to measure cartilage volume (CV) and bone marrow lesions (BMLs) at baseline and 10.7 years. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain questionnaire was used to measure knee pain at all assessments. Baseline energy-adjusted DII (E-DII) scores were calculated using a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire. X-ray was performed to assess radiographic knee osteoarthritis (ROA). Linear, log-binomial regression and linear mixed-effects modelling with adjustments for covariates were used to examine the associations of E-DII with CV loss, BML size increase and knee pain, respectively. Pain trajectories (i.e., ‘Minimal Pain’, ‘Mild Pain’, and ‘Moderate Pain’) were previously identified in this cohort using group-based trajectory modelling [1]. Multi-nominal logistic regression was used to examine the association between E-DII and pain trajectory groups.ResultsThe mean E-DII at baseline was -0.48±1.39. In multivariable analyses, E-DII score was not associated with tibial CV loss and BML size increase [CV loss: β=0.03% per annum, 95%CI -0.01–0.06; BML size increase: relative risk (RR)=0.94, 95%CI 0.84–1.05;]. Higher E-DII was associated with greater pain score over 10.7 years (β=0.21, 95%CI 0.004-0.43) and an increased risk of belonging to ‘Moderate pain’ as compared to ‘Minimal Pain’ trajectory group [relative risk ratio (RRR): 1.19, 95%CI 1.02-1.39] after adjustment for age, body mass index, physical activity, education level, employment, emotional problems, comorbidities, and ROA.ConclusionHigher DII was associated with greater pain score and higher risk of more severe pain trajectory, but not structural changes, suggesting discordance between effects of diet on structural damage and pain, and that targeting pro-inflammatory diets may be beneficial to reduce pain.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call