Abstract
BackgroundPain, morning stiffness and disease activity are core domains of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), relevant to patients (pts) and physicians. AS treatment guidelines recommend using the AS Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (ASDASCRP) to assess disease activity. Greater improvements in pain, morning stiffness and disease activity were previously shown with tofacitinib vs placebo (PBO) in pts with AS.[1]There are limited data on time to improvement in these core domains in pts with AS receiving tofacitinib.ObjectivesTo estimate the median time to improvement of pain, morning stiffness and disease activity in tofacitinib-treated pts with AS.MethodsThis post hoc analysis used data from a Phase 3 trial (NCT03502616)[1]in pts with AS receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or PBO to Week (W)16. After W16, all pts received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg BID to W48. Outcomes included nocturnal pain (numerical rating scale 0–10), morning stiffness (mean of Bath AS Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] Questions 5 and 6), BASDAI total score and ASDASCRP. Median time (weeks) to initial improvement events was estimated using non-parametric Kaplan-Meier models. Initial improvement event was defined as time to first post-baseline observation with an improvement of ≥30% (nocturnal pain [“much improved”][2]), ≥50% (nocturnal pain [“very much improved”],[2]morning stiffness and BASDAI total score) or ASDASCRP≥1.1 (clinically important improvement)/≥2.0 (major improvement) points.ResultsOverall, 269 pts (tofacitinib: n=133; PBO→tofacitinib: n=136) were assessed. Median times to initial improvement events were shorter with tofacitinib vs PBO→tofacitinib (p<0.05 [Table 1]). Median times to initial ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in nocturnal pain for tofacitinib were 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, and 24 weeks (8 weeks since switch to tofacitinib) for both thresholds for PBO→tofacitinib. Median time to initial ≥50% improvement in morning stiffness and BASDAI total score for tofacitinib was 12 weeks, and 32 weeks (16 weeks since switch to tofacitinib) for PBO→tofacitinib. Median time to ASDASCRPimprovement ≥1.1 for tofacitinib was 4 weeks, and 24 weeks for PBO→tofacitinib (not estimable [NE] for ASDASCRPimprovement ≥2.0 [both treatment arms]). Limitations: this was a post hoc analysis, there was no active treatment comparator, trial pt population may not reflect routine care pt population and comparisons with PBO were only possible to W16.Table 1.Median times (weeks) to initial improvement events (Kaplan-Meier analysis)Median time (interquartile range)Improvement thresholdTofacitinib 5 mg BID (N=133)PBO→tofacitiniba(N=136)p value≥30% improvementNocturnal pain4 (2–24)24 (8–32)0.0003≥50% improvementNocturnal pain8 (4–40)24 (16–NE)<0.0001Morning stiffness12 (4–NE)32 (24–NE)0.0091BASDAI total score12 (4–NE)32 (16–NE)0.0002Improvement in ASDASCRP≥1.1 points4 (2–20)24 (12–40)<0.0001≥2.0 pointsNENE0.0361p values are based on log-rank tests for differences in survival curves for tofacitinib vs PBO→tofacitinibaSwitched to open-label tofacitinib at W16ConclusionIn pts with AS, during the first month of tofacitinib treatment, it is expected that half of pts will experience ≥30% improvement in nocturnal pain (“much improved”) and a clinically important improvement in ASDASCRP. During the first 2 and 3 months of tofacitinib treatment, it is expected that half of pts will experience ≥50% improvement in nocturnal pain (“very much improved”) and morning stiffness, respectively. Improvements in pain, morning stiffness and disease activity occurred more rapidly with tofacitinib vs PBO→tofacitinib. This study informs physicians and pts receiving tofacitinib of when improvement in these core domains in AS may be anticipated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.