Abstract
BackgroundIn radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) it has been hypothesized that inflammation-driven bone loss triggers bone repair at anatomically distinct sites of the same vertebra: bone loss occurring in the trabecular bone and ectopic bone formation in the periosteum1.ObjectivesTo investigate whether inflammation is associated with lower bone density (surrogate of bone loss) and subsequently, if lower bone density is associated with 2-year bone formation in r-axSpA at the same vertebra.MethodsData from the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis (SIAS), a multicentre 2-year cohort, was used. Baseline vertebral bone density was assessed by Hounsfield Units (HU) on low dose Computed Tomography (ldCT) by two independent readers (Figure 1). Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) bone marrow edema (BME) status scores, and 2-year ldCT syndesmophyte formation or growth change scores were assessed by three and two readers respectively. Inter-reader reliability was assessed for each imaging scoring by vertebra. Average of readers´ continuous scores (bone density HU) or readers´ agreement in binary scores (MRI-BME and bone formation) were used at the same vertebra (1-present in ≥1 quadrant/0-absent in all quadrants). The hypothesised associations were tested in multilevel generalised estimating equations models adjusted for confounders, the unit of analysis being the vertebra.ResultsWe analysed 1,100 vertebrae in 50 patients with r-axSpA. Intraclass correlation coefficients for HU measurements varied from 0.89 to 0.97, Fleiss Kappa values for MRI-BME were between 0.41-0.78 and Cohen´s kappa for syndesmophyte formation/growth change scores varied from 0.36 to 0.74. Bone density HU decreased from cranial to caudal vertebrae. Baseline MRI-BME was present in 300/985 (30%) and syndesmophytes in 588/910 (65%) vertebrae, both most prevalent at the thoracolumbar region. Syndesmophyte formation or growth was observed in 18% of at-risk vertebrae (124/691). A significant association was found between inflammation (MRI-BME) and lower bone density (regression coefficient=-51; 95% CI:-63;-39) (Table 1A). Bone density was not associated with 2-year syndesmophyte formation or growth (adjOR 1.00; 95% CI:0.99;1.00) (Table 1B).Table 1.Relationships between (A) baseline MRI detected spinal inflammation (MRI-BME) and bone density, and (B) baseline bone density and ldCT bone formation after two years, at the same vertebra.A.Independent variablesBone density (Hounsfield Units)Univariable analysisMultivariable analysisReg coeff. (95% CI)Adj Reg coeff. (95% CI)N = 910 to 985N = 985MRI-BME (presence)-51 (-63 to -39)-51 (-63 to -39)Age (years)-1 (-2 to 1)-1 (-2 to 1)Gender (male)21 (-20 to 63)16 (-24 to 57)TNFi treatment (yes)26 (-7 to 59)27 (-6 to 61)Baseline syndesmophytes (presence)*-42 (-54 to -30)-B.Independent variablesSyndesmophyte formation or growth§Univariable analysisMultivariable analysisOR (95% CI)AdjOR (95% CI)N = 672 to 691N = 672Bone density (HU)1.00 (0.99 to 1.00)1.00 (0.99 to 1.00)Age (years)1.02 (0.99 to 1.06)1.02 (0.98 to 1.05)Gender (male)0.44 (0.13 to 1.52)0.56 (0.15 to 2.06)Smoking (current)0.89 (0.40 to 1.97)1.02 (0.42 to 2.44)Treatment with TNFi (yes)1.34 (0.56 to 3.21)1.30 (0.43 to 3.90)MRI-BME (presence)2.03 (1.23 to 3.71)1.73 (1.06 to 3.34)Baseline syndesmophytes (presence)*2.84 (1.83 to 4.41)-*Multicollinearity with MRI-BME. § Absolute agreement of readers.adjOR - adjusted odds ratio; CI-confidence interval; BME - bone marrow edema; HU - Hounsfield units; ldCT - low dose computed tomography; MRI - magnetic resonance imaging; TNFi – Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Statistical significance highlighted in bold.ConclusionWhile in r-axSpA vertebral inflammation associates with low vertebral bone density, lower vertebral bone density itself does not increase the risk for ectopic bone formation at the same vertebra.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.