Abstract

BackgroundMethotrexate (MTX) is the recommended first-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) rat is a robust model with a high prevalence of arthritis used to investigate arthritis. MTX reduces inflammation, but associated with adverse events, such as gastrointestinal, hepatic, and hematology toxicity (1). To reduce these side effects, folic acid (FA) is administrated at distance to MTX with no defined recommendation for its dosing (5-25mg/week) or time point of administration (2) (1-3 days after MTX application). Whether the complicated therapeutic regimen with MTX once a week and FA at another time point affects compliance is an open question. MTX is metabolized in polyglutamates derivates (MTX-PG), which is a biomarker of MTX efficacy as its half-life (1-4 weeks) is longer than MTX (4h) (3).ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess efficacy and tolerance of co-administration of MTX and FA compared to MTX with FA applied one day after MTX in the AIA.MethodsFemale Lewis rat were randomly divided in three groups and received an injection of Mycobacterium butyricum defining day (D) 0 to induce arthritis. An historic AIA group was used as control. Treatment began on D9, one day before arthritis onset in this model. The first group rats were treated with MTX only (n=13), the second group received MTX and FA at the same day (n=14), and the third group received FA one day after MTX administration (n=14). MTX was administrated intraperitoneally (IP) at 1 mg/kg every 3 days (4) and FA was delivered IP at 0.17 mg/kg. Arthritic index (AI) and ankle circumference (AC) were monitored to assess arthritis. Microcomputed tomography of the ankle was performed to assess bone loss. Moreover, complete blood count, transaminases, and MTX-PG were assessed.ResultsArthritis developed at D10 in all groups. AI and AC were similar in MTX groups at the various time points. At D17, arthritis severity was lower in MTX groups (AI (mean and standard deviation): 1.4 ± 1.6; AC: 35 ± 7 mm) compared to AIA historical group (AI: 3.3 ± 0.6; AC: 42 ± 4 mm). Bone erosion and bone loss parameters were similar in all groups. Cortical porosity was around 0.40% ± 0.15 and bone volume / total volume was around 0.22% ± 0.13. MTX-PG1 was found at similar levels in MTX groups and correlated negatively with AI in MTX alone or MTX and FA at the same day groups (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). Finally, white and red blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, transaminases, and creatinine were found at a similar level in MTX groups.ConclusionCo-administration of MTX with FA on the same day is effective compared to FA application one day after MTX. MTX metabolism was not affected, as demonstrated by the MTX-PG concentrations. The biological tolerance between the protocols was comparable. Thus, co-administration of MTX and FA seems to be possible and may be more convenient to the patients and improve compliance at the end.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call