POS0635 COMPARING THE ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION IN PATIENTS WITH JAPANESE RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS BETWEEN BARICITINIB AND TNF ANTAGONIST THERAPY

Abstract

Background:Baricitinib (BAR) and TNF antagonist are the important therapeutic agent for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.However there is still few studies of improvement of ultrasonographic findings in RA treated comparison with BAR and TNF.Objectives:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of BAR and TNF therapy patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using ultrasonography (US).Methods:Participants comprised 16 and 45 Japanese RA patients who had recently received BAR and TNF. All patients with a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. Patients underwent clinical and laboratory assessments every 4 weeks from baseline to 24 weeks, and US assessments at baseline, 4, 12 and 24 weeks. Gray scale (GS) and power doppler (PD) signals were scored using a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3 at 26 (0-78) synovial sites (22 joints) in the following joints: bilateral first to fifth metacarpopharangeal (MCP) joints (dorsal recess); first interphalangeal (IP) and second to fifth proximal interphalangeal (PIP) (dorsal recess) joints; and the wrists (dorsal radial, median and ulnar). We evaluated the improvement of GS and PD score from baseline to week 24.Results:In the patients receiving BAR (n=16) and TNF (n=45), the mean age was 55.9 vs 54.6 years old (p=0.682), disease duration was 10.2 vs 6.1 years (p=0.094), the rate of MTX use was 75% vs 89% (p=346), the mean MTX dose was 9.3 vs 10.2 mg/w (p=0.443), the rate of ACPA positive was 94% vs 82% (p=0.476), DAS28-ESR was 4.25 vs 4.61 (p=0.289), CDAI was 15.8 vs 18.5 (p=0.210), GS score was 21.6 vs 16.3 (p=0.436) and PD score was 15.0 vs 9.5 (p=0.260). The degree of improvement respective changes in GS and PD score after 4, 12 and 24 weeks were as follows: GS: -7.2 vs -3.7 (p=0.268) and PD: -7.6 vs -2.3 (p=0.158) after 4 weeks, GS: -10.9 vs -5.0 (p=0.161) and PD: -9.2 vs -3.8 (p=0.049) after 12 weeks, GS: -12.9 vs -6.1 (p=0.485) and PD: -11.3 vs -5.7 (p=0.062) after 24 weeks between BAR and TNF (Fig.1, 2). Next, The improvement rate of respective changes in GS and PD score after 4, 12 and 24 weeks were as follows: GS: -23.8% vs -11.6% (p=0.580) and PD: -30.3% vs -16.5% (p=0.343) after 4 weeks, GS: -39.6% vs -15.6% (p=0.129) and PD: -47.1% vs -30.8% (p=0.210) after 12 weeks, GS: -52.2% vs -22.2% (p=0.248) and PD: -77.1% vs -50.1% (p=0.048) after 24 weeks between BAR and TNF.Conclusion:The present study provides evidence supporting both the BAR and TNF therapy showed improvement effect over time, but in a comparison between BAR and TNF, the PD score of BAR showed a siginificant improvement effect compared to TNF at 12 and 24 weeks. It was suggeted that BAR may improve inflammatory synovitis earlier compared to TNF.Disclosure of Interests:None declared