POS0157 IMPLEMENTATION OF A VACCINATION TOOL IN THE ELECTRONIC PATIENT HEALTH RECORD COINCIDES WITH A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN VACCINATION COVERAGE.

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are at higher risk for infectious diseases. Despite this increased risk and the available guidelines1,2, we reported a suboptimal vaccination rate of 27 % of IMID patients in 2018. In the meantime, a vaccination module was introduced in the electronic patient medical record (EMR) of our hospital to accurately document and monitor vaccination status of patients.ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of a new vaccination module in the patient health record on vaccination coverage in a previously included IMID cohort.MethodsBetween Aug and Oct 2021, the vaccination status of 1435 (out of the original 1488) IMID patients (45 % male, median age 53.6 years) was collected (790 patients with IBD (inflammatory bowel diseases), 607 with rheumatologic inflammatory conditions (RHEU)(RA or SpA), and 38 with dermatologic inflammatory conditions(DER)) and was compared to that of 2018. The vaccination status for influenza (FLU), pneumococci (Pnc), hepatitis B (Hep B) and tetanus (TT) was obtained mainly through the patients’ electronic medical records. Missing data were added after contacting patients or their general practitioner.ResultsFrom 2018 to 2021, the overall vaccination coverage (excluding TT) of all IMID patients significantly increased from 42 % to 66 % (p<0.001, Figure 1).Figure 1.Percentages of total vaccination coverage in 2018 vs. 2021 in patients with IMID – TT vaccination excludedFor patients with RHEU, the vaccination coverage significantly increased, namely from 69.0% to 75 % for FLU (p<0.001), from 36 % to 89 % for Pnc (p<0.001), from 57 % to 73 % for Hep B (p<0.001) and from 34 % to 74 % overall (p=0.008) (Figure 1 and Table 1).Table 1.Vaccine coverage in 2018 vs. 2021 in patients with IMIDFLU (%)Pnc (%)Hep B*(%)TT (%)IBD (n=790)2018: 762018: 732018: 672018: 802021: 872021: 822021: 792021: 67p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001RHEU (n=607)2018: 692018: 362018: 572018: 652021: 752021: 892021: 732021: 41%p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001p-value = 0.038DER (n=38)2018: 742018: 612018: 472018: 792021: 712021: 822021: 652021: 71p-value = 0.116p-value = 0.401p-value < 0.001p-value = 0.394All IMID (n=1435)2018: 732018: 582018: 632018: 742021: 812021: 852021: 772021: 56p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001p-value < 0.001*recommended in all seronegative IMID patients with IBD and patients at risk for other IMIDsSimilarly, the vaccination coverage in IBD patients increased significantly from 76 % to 87 % for FLU (p<0.001), from 73 % to 82 % for Pnc (p<0.001), from 67 % to 79 % for Hep B (p<0.001) and from 47 % to 61 % overall (p<0.001) (Figure 1 and Table 1).For patients with DER, vaccination coverage significantly increased from 47 % to 65 % for Hep B (p<0.001) (Table 1). TT vaccination coverage decreased in all 3 IMID groups from 2018 to 2021.ConclusionThe implementation of a vaccination tool integrated in the EMR coincided with a significant increase in vaccination rates and also in the total amount of IMID patients that were fully vaccinated according to guidelines. Quite likely, the suboptimal vaccination rate measured in 2018 and the COVID-19 pandemic also raised awareness among patients and healthcare professionals about the importance of following vaccination guidelines.