Abstract

Aim: To determine if three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis (3D QCA) provides an advantage over twodimensional (2D QCA) by increasing accuracy and precision of length measurements through compensating for foreshortening inherent to 2D images. Material and methods: A total of 800 inter-marker length measurements were performed (8 per wire, 5-40 mm) with novel 3D software and standard 2D software and compared with the true lengths of the inter-marker distances on the wire in coronary vessels of 21 patients recruited. Results: 2D QCA generally underestimated true length in comparison to 3D, and the discrepancy increased with absolute length. In contrast, 3D QCA showed a minimal difference from true length over the examined range of lengths. Conclusions: 3D QCA minimizes errors in length measurements associated with foreshortening, shows minimal difference from true length, and performs significantly better in comparison to 2D QCA. The advantage of 3D QCA is more pronounced at longer lengths.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.