Abstract

Budget speeches are a fixed political event in Malaysia. Their content involves the whole country and a variety of domains. Despite the cornucopia of research on speeches, budget speeches are rarely selected and speeches from Malaysia have not been examined in detail. The discourse in these speeches can display how a developing country tackles economic decision-making. The article explores the portrayal of economic competence in Malaysian federal budget speeches. It conducts a linguistic analysis grounded in critical discourse studies. The analysis employs frequency, concordance and the representation of social actors to decipher monetary amount, politonyms, ethnonyms and toponyms. The discourse in budget speeches can portray economic competence, which has three characteristics. First, the government can claim to be financially solvent and propose significant initiatives. Second, the government introduces desirable initiatives because it intervenes to ensure economic growth. Third, the government helps citizens of several ethnicities and regions although Bumiputeras, Sabah and Sarawak are prioritized. The portrayal entails an ideological government-citizen binary because the government is the source of initiatives while citizens are the target of initiatives. The portrayal was reproduced in other texts and was repeated in the media. The portrayal became the endorsed way to think about the former Barisan Nasional (BN) government but other parties questioned it. The article argues that BN sought to legitimize its political power but its legitimacy became compromised, and it was defeated in the 2018 general elections.

Highlights

  • The first mention of “budget speech” is traced to 1797 in Britain (Google Ngram Viewer, 2019)

  • In Malaysia, budget speeches are a fixed political event and their content is eagerly anticipated by various sectors of society (Ferry, Zakaria & Eckersley, 2014)

  • These speeches are an instance of political discourse because the government shares its perspective about the economy

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The first mention of “budget speech” is traced to 1797 in Britain (Google Ngram Viewer, 2019). Budget speeches garner substantial interest among a national and international audience because the prediction of revenues and expenditures, and the declaration of initiatives can determine economic growth for several years These speeches influence the lives of citizens and can shape their perception about a political party (Thompson, 2015). The speeches idealize the government (Don, Knowles & Fatt, 2010; Ghazali, 2003; Lim, 2002; Rajandran, 2013) because it helps citizens flourish (Cheng, 2006; Slavíčková, 2013) or overcome problems (Gregor & Macková, 2015; Karaliova, 2016) Their discourse is ideological (van Dijk, 1997) and it can generate symbolic capital (Bourdieu, 1997) to legitimize the political power of governments. Considering the prominence of money in budget speeches, and the developmental state in Malaysia, the article poses this research question: How are monetary amount, the government and citizens portrayed in budget speeches? Grounded in critical discourse studies (Fairclough, 2003; van Dijk, 2016), this question is answered by adopting approaches in corpus linguistics (frequency, concordance) (Baker, 2006) and discourse studies (representation of social actors) (van Leeuwen, 2008)

METHODOLOGY
Findings
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.