Abstract

Portland Cement Pervious Concrete (PCPC) is becoming more utilized across the U.S. due to increased re- quirements for stormwater management. This paper details the experience of the installation of a PCPC test sec- tion/parking area in Sioux City, Iowa. In order to evaluate a large number of mixture designs, the test section incorporated five different mixtures, each placed with and without air entraining agent, for a total of ten sections. Cylinder samples were prepared during construction and compared with core data. The samples were tested for void ratio, permeability, unit weight, compressive strength development with time, and spatial distribution of material properties across the pavement profile. The results show a high degree of variability in material properties between the top and bottom layers, especially in the bottom five cm (two in.). Strong relationships between unit weight, permeability, strength, and void ratio suggest that void ratio criteria determined from unit weight testing has the potential for use as QA/QC criteria for pervious con- crete field placement.

Highlights

  • Portland Cement Pervious Concrete (PCPC) pavement has been in use for over 30 years in the United States, and an experimental road was constructed in England in the 1960’s [1, 2]

  • The unit weight and compressive strengths were highly variable with unit weight ranges of 1829 kg/m3 (114.2 pcf) to 2305 kg/m3 (143.9 pcf) and compressive strength between 11.1 kPa (1616 psi) and 55.0 kPa (7,975 psi) the extremely

  • Unit weight values ranged from 1647 kg/m3 (102.8 pcf) for the highest void ratio sample to 2223 kg/m3 (138.8 pcf) for the lowest void ratio sample

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Portland Cement Pervious Concrete (PCPC) pavement has been in use for over 30 years in the United States, and an experimental road was constructed in England in the 1960’s [1, 2]. Core sample compressive strength values follow a similar trend with the highest strength produced from the lowest void ratio. COMPARISON OF TEST RESULTS FROM FIELD PLACED AND CORE SAMPLES

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call