Abstract
Researchers usually specify risk aversion coefficients from 1 (lowest) to M (highest) for a portfolio to indicate active or passive approaches. How effective is this practice? Recent studies suggest that the global minimum variance portfolio (GMVP) is statistically equivalent to portfolios with extensive risk aversion coefficients (the GMVP-equivalent). Expressing the risk aversion coefficient as a Taylor series of the target return and efficient set constants, we generalize the previous result to the non-GMVP-equivalents and segment mean-variance portfolios according to a hierarchy of risk aversion coefficients. In this paper, we show that hierarchical risk aversion coefficients are superior to isometric attributes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.