Abstract
The suitability of using factors or benchmarks to measure portfolio performance is analysed. Fama and French factors are constructed from Russell US stock indexes and then directly utilized as benchmarks. The interpretation of factors as zero-investment benchmarks makes it difficult to explain performance measurement as the comparison of active versus passive management, given the short selling restrictions often applied to mutual funds. Empirical results reveal similar biases in extended Jensen's alphas in models with both factors and with benchmarks and with convexity and nonnegativity restrictions. Selection of the benchmarks has a more important effect than the model type chosen.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
