Abstract

Superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) resection and reconstruction during pancreatic surgery are increasingly common. Several reconstruction techniques exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of patients and clinical outcomes for SMV/PV reconstruction using interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allograft (AG+) or primary end-to-end anastomosis (AG-) after segmental vein resections during pancreatic surgery. All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with SMV/PV resection and reconstruction from 2006 to 2015 were identified. Clinical and histopathologic outcomes as well as preoperative and postoperative radiologic findings were assessed. A total of 171 patients were identified. The study included 42 and 71 patients reconstructed with AG+ and AG-, respectively. Patients in the AG+ group had longer mean operative time (506minutes [standard deviation, 83minutes] for AG+ vs 420minutes [standard deviation, 91minutes] for AG-; P< .01) and more intraoperative bleeding (median, 1000mL [interquartile range (IQR), 650-2200mL] for AG+ vs 600mL [IQR, 300-1000mL] for AG-; P< .01). Neoadjuvant therapy was administered more frequently for patients in the AG+ group (23.8% vs 8.5%; P= .02). Patients with AG+ had a longer length of tumor-vein involvement (median, 2.4cm [IQR, 1.6-3.0cm] for AG+ vs 1.8cm [IQR, 1.2-2.4cm] for AG-; P= .01), and a higher number of patients had a tumor-vein interface >180 degrees (35.7% for AG+ vs 21.1% for AG-; P=.02). There was no difference in number of patients with major complications (42.9% for AG+ vs 36.6% for AG-; P= .51) or early failure at the reconstruction site (9.5% for AG+ vs 8.5% for AG-; P= 1). A subgroup analysis of 10 patients in the AG+ group revealed the presence of donor-specific antibodies in all patients. The short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts is comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis. Graft rejection could be a contributing factor to severe stenosis in patients reconstructed with allograft.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.