Abstract

The explosion of global container trade in the last two decades has significantly influenced the port geography of Latin America & the Caribbean (LAC), leading to a concentration of container traffic at selected ports. Theory suggests that, as port systems become mature, they tend to deconcentration, partly due to the emergence of secondary ports. Previous research has examined the region’s dominant ports, but an unanswered research question is how the evolution of this port system is influencing and being influenced by the actions of those ports currently occupying a secondary rank in the LAC port hierarchy.The methodology is based primarily on analysis of time series data on container movements between 1997 and 2012, revealing patterns of cargo flows and transhipment location choices. The institutional context of devolution processes and new investments in the region provides additional insight into the performance of selected ports. From a theoretical perspective, this analysis is situated within the context of recent institutional approaches that examine the port’s ability to act through critical moments and junctures, in order to deepen understanding of which of the various factors influencing port system deconcentration are the most sensitive to successful institutional adaptations.Results show that the manufacturing of strategic locations can be successful and may have driven the emergence of secondary ports in the LAC system. This finding demonstrates how path dependence can be challenged by new developments, the identification and success of which are nevertheless contingent on factors such as the first mover advantage, port planning regimes and diversification of port roles. The paper identifies some of the key factors influencing the transition of a port system from concentration at a few dominant ports to a deconcentrated system of primary and secondary ports, which can be applied to other port systems in future research.

Highlights

  • Ports and port systems have been studied by geographers for several decades, as their evolution can be observed via spatial developments of nodes and corridors, as well as exhibiting processes of concentration and centralisation of trade and traffic flows

  • The paper aims to understand the evolution of maritime networks and the autopoietic nature of port development as secondary ports seek to reposition themselves within emerging feeder markets through a variety of proactive and reactive strategies that involve different actors within a complex institutional environment

  • Geographical analyses of port system evolution have proceeded from traditional spatial models to more recent focuses on port competition and the structure of maritime services

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ports and port systems have been studied by geographers for several decades, as their evolution can be observed via spatial developments of nodes and corridors, as well as exhibiting processes of concentration and centralisation of trade and traffic flows. The goal of this paper to systematise them will be aided by applying recent theoretical approaches ( Jacobs and Notteboom, 2011) to an analysis of the transition of the LAC port system from phase three to phase four From this theoretical perspective, the paper aims to understand the evolution of maritime networks and the autopoietic nature of port development as secondary ports seek to reposition themselves within emerging feeder markets through a variety of proactive and reactive strategies that involve different actors within a complex institutional environment. As port activity growth in Panama is related to transhipment traffic, it might be argued that this is a first indicator of the changes in the port system towards the third phase hub-and-spoke structure as indicated by Wilmsmeier and Notteboom (2011), leading to a concentration in the port system towards transhipment hubs, a development that is driven by liner shipping strategies rather than economic development. These maps and figures will be explored in detail in the relevant sections below

The Pacific
The Atlantic
The Caribbean
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call