Abstract

With estimated shale gas resources greater than those of US and Canada combined, China has been embarking on an ambitious shale development program. However, nearly 30 years of American experience in shale hydrocarbon exploration and production indicates a low total recovery of shale gas at 12 %–30 % and tight oil at 5 %–10 %. One of the main barriers to sustainable development of shale resources, namely the pore structure (geometry and connectivity) of the nanopores for storing and transporting hydrocarbons, is rarely investigated. In this study, we collected samples from a variety of leading hydrocarbon-producing shale formations in US and China. These formations have different ages and geologic characteristics (e.g., porosity, permeability, mineralogy, total organic content, and thermal maturation). We studied their pore structure characteristics, imbibition and saturated diffusion, edge-accessible porosity, and wettability with four complementary tests: mercury intrusion porosimetry, fluid and tracer imbibition into initially dry shale, tracer diffusion into fluid-saturated shale, and high-pressure Wood’s metal intrusion followed with imaging and elemental mapping. The imbibition and diffusion tests use tracer-bearing wettability fluids (API brine or n-decane) to examine the association of tracers with mineral or organic matter phases, using a sensitive and micro-scale elemental laser ablation ICP-MS mapping technique. For two molecular tracers in n-decane fluid with the estimated sizes of 1.39 nm × 0.29 nm × 0.18 nm for 1-iododecane and 1.27 nm × 0.92 nm × 0.78 nm for trichlorooxobis (triphenylphosphine) rhenium, much less penetration was observed for larger molecules of organic rhenium in shales with median pore-throat sizes of several nanometers. This indicates the probable entanglement of sub-nano-sized molecules in shales with nano-sized pore-throats. Overall findings from the above innovative approaches indicate the limited accessibility (several millimeters from sample edge) and connectivity of tortuous nanopore spaces in shales with spatial wettability, which could lead to the low overall hydrocarbon recovery because of the limited fracture–matrix connection and migration of hydrocarbon molecules from the shale matrix to the stimulated fracture network.

Highlights

  • Since 2000, the technological development of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in US has led to a dramatic increase in hydrocarbon production from shale formations, changing the fossil energy outlook in the US and worldwide (DOE 2009; Jarvie 2012; EIA 2014).Pet

  • We collected samples from a variety of leading hydrocarbon-producing shale formations in US and China. These formations have different ages and geologic characteristics. We studied their pore structure characteristics, imbibition and saturated diffusion, edge-accessible porosity, and wettability with four complementary tests: mercury intrusion porosimetry, fluid and tracer imbibition into initially dry shale, tracer & Qin-Hong Hu water19049@gmail.com

  • As measured by MICP, pores in American and Chinese shales are predominantly in the nm size range with a measured median pore-throat diameter of 4.1–65.9 nm (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 2000, the technological development of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in US has led to a dramatic increase in hydrocarbon (gas and oil) production from shale formations, changing the fossil energy outlook in the US and worldwide (DOE 2009; Jarvie 2012; EIA 2014).Pet. Since 2000, the technological development of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in US has led to a dramatic increase in hydrocarbon (gas and oil) production from shale formations, changing the fossil energy outlook in the US and worldwide (DOE 2009; Jarvie 2012; EIA 2014). Despite the increased gas and oil production from shale formations, analyses of data from 65,000 shale wells in 30 shale gas and 21 tight oil fields in the US led Hughes (2013a, b) to argue that the shale revolution will be hard to sustain. The recovery rate for tight oil is even lower at 5 %–10 % (Hoffman 2012), for example, the oil recovery rate in the middle member Bakken formation ranges from 2 % to 5 % to as high as 20 % (Jarvie 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call