Abstract

In order to understand the pore structures of the Middle Jurassic Xishanyao Formation in the Junggar Basin, 11 shale samples from a single well were picked and were subjected to several analyses including mineralogy, (programmed) Rock-Eval pyrolysis for geochemical and N2 adsorption for pore structure analysis. The results showed that the mean value of total organic carbon (TOC) content of these samples is around 1.54% while Tmax varies between 429 to 443°C, indicating they are in the oil window. Mineral assemblages of the samples is mainly quartz and clay (illite, chlorite and kaolinite). Moreover, negative correlations between the K-feldspar/plagioclase and micro-mesopore volume was found, depicting that few of such pore sizes exist in these two abundant minerals. In contrast, micro, meso and macro pores all were detected in clay minerals. Particularly, the pores with radii of around 5.35 nm were abundant in clay minerals and there was not a robust relationship between the organic matter, surface area and pore volume. Finally, fractal analysis was performed to better delineate heterogenous characteristics of pore structures which showed that D2 (representing the larger pores) is greater than D1 (smaller pores). In addition, the differences between the fractal dimensions of the adsorption and desorption (D2d–D2a) branches to better interpret the hysteresis, was defined. The positive correlation between the (D2d–D2a) and the meso-macro pore volume, pointed out that the meso-macro condensation is the main reason for hysteresis that was observed in N2 adsorption experiments in the Xishanyao Shale samples.

Highlights

  • Organic rich shales have historically been the source rock, but due to recent advancements in technology they are the new target for oil and gas production and have increased in importance (Zou et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2021)

  • The default pyrolysis method was utilized to find the total organic carbon (TOC) content of these samples from Rock-Eval 6 pyrolysis analyzer following the method by Liu et al (2019a) and geochemical parameters including: S1 (the amount of free hydrocarbons in the sample), S2 and the Tmax value (the temperature at which the maximum release of hydrocarbons from cracking of kerogen occurs during pyrolysis) are determined

  • 11 samples varying in depth from a single well were retrieved from the Xishanyao Shale Formation and were subjected to N2 gas adsorption for the pore structure analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organic rich shales have historically been the source rock, but due to recent advancements in technology they are the new target for oil and gas production and have increased in importance (Zou et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2021). The default pyrolysis method was utilized to find the total organic carbon (TOC) content of these samples from Rock-Eval 6 pyrolysis analyzer following the method by Liu et al (2019a) and geochemical parameters including: S1 (the amount of free hydrocarbons (gas and oil) in the sample), S2 (the amount of hydrocarbons generated through thermal cracking of nonvolatile organic matter) and the Tmax value (the temperature at which the maximum release of hydrocarbons from cracking of kerogen occurs during pyrolysis (top of S2 peak)) are determined These 11 samples were crushed into powders (

Results and discussions
IIB III III IIB IIB IIB IIB IIB III III
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call