Abstract
Low Salinity Waterflooding (LSWF) has become a popular tertiary injection EOR method recently. Both fluid-fluid and fluid-rock interactions are suggested as the contributing mechanisms on the effectiveness of LSWF. Considering the contradictory remarks in the literature, the dominating mechanisms and necessary conditions for Low Salinity Effect (LSE) varies for different crude oil-brine-rock (CBR) systems. The aim of the present study is to investigate LSE for an oil field in the Middle East that is composed of separate sandstone and limestone layers. Contact angles and Interfacial Tension (IFT) are measured to have more insight on the CBR under investigation. Visual experiments were conducted in micromodels to determine the dominating mechanisms of LSE. Experiments were conducted under water-wet and oil-wet conditions for both sandstone and limestone representing micromodels. Several secondary and tertiary injection scenarios were performed with different levels of salinities. Consecutive injection of high-salinity and low-salinity water illustrated that LSE occurs under certain conditions. For both rock types, during the secondary high salinity injection, the oil trapping mechanism was mostly snap-off under water-wet condition, while fingering/bypassing was dominant under oil-wet conditions. LSWF causes diminutive changes of saturation redistribution in water-wet micromodels. Even in rare occasions that oil ganglia started to reshape or redistribute, it became trapped again in the downstream pores of the model, and not produced effectively. Contrary to this, LSWF was very effective under oil-wetting conditions. Continuous oil films, which exist in oil-wet condition, are beneficial for the effectiveness of LSE. Measured IFT and contact angles cannot justify the observed LSE. Additionally in the designed micromodels, any contribution of clay or fine migration to the LSE is ruled out. Spontaneous formation of the micro-emulsion was a very weak mechanism in our experiments and did not contribute to pushing oil out of the dead end pores or divert the flow path to the un-swept areas. Visual investigations suggested that formation of the visco-elastic interface can be the dominating mechanism for LSE in the investigated CBRs which is more effective in the case of oil-wet system due to the lack of snap-off trapping mechanism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.