Abstract

Pore pressure prediction plays an important role in shale gas exploration and fracking technology. The pore pressure in shale cannot be directly measured but to be inferred by the normal velocity trend, so methods based on the effective stress theory are dedicated to establishing a function between seismic interval velocity and pressure. Among them the mostly used method is Eaton’s equation. However, how to precisely quantify the state of compaction remains unsolved. In this study, the AVO/AVA simultaneous inversion was introduced to estimate P-velocity. According to the exponential relationship between the pore pressure and the ratio of velocities, three different methods including the fitting method, the direct calculation method and the model-based direct calculation method based on the Eaton’s equation were used to estimate shale gas pore pressure, respectively. And then a comparative analysis was performed to see the impact of normal compaction trend on the result. It was found that the horizontal continuity of the model-based direct calculation method was the best. The result shows that the approach of estimating the normal compaction trend impacts the pore pressure significantly.

Highlights

  • Shale gas usually has the characteristic of high pore pressure [Serebryakov et al, 2002]

  • Since only two parameters that pore pressure and P-velocity are contained in the formula, the fitting method can avoid the calculation of regional normal compaction trend (NCT)

  • The fitting method only needs to estimate the borehole-side NCT, and the pore pressure is calculated by the simple fitted formula, which contributes to the high efficiency

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Shale gas usually has the characteristic of high pore pressure [Serebryakov et al, 2002]. The remained fluids in pores have to support part of the weight of overlying sediments and so produce abnormal high pressure Porosity in this case is higher than the normal. Getting the proper NCT is a hard work, the knowledge to a field is needed for the determination of the coefficient, and repeated attempts are performed to gain satisfied results. In this case, we tried to find a way to avoid the direct computation of NCT. The effect of the NCT generated by different methods on the result can be seen from comparative analysis

EATON’S EQUATION
THEORY
APPLICATION
THE FITTING METHOD
THE DIRECT CALCULATION METHOD
THE MODEL BASED CALCULATION METHOD
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call