Pore network characteristics of lacustrine shales in the Dongpu Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China, with implications for oil retention

Abstract

Abstract Pore development and the location of retained hydrocarbons are key topics to understand the shale oil system. In an attempt to investigate pore network characteristics and oil retention in lacustrine shales, 24 samples from the Es3 shales in the Dongpu Depression, Bohai Bay Basin were subjected to mineralogical, petrological, geochemistry and pore structure investigations using X-ray diffraction (XRD), thin section, field emission-scanning electronic microscope (FE-SEM), N2 adsorption-desorption. After removing retained oil by solvent extraction, 12 selected samples were again analyzed by Rock-Eval pyrolysis and N2 adsorption-desorption experiment. According to the mineral compositions and petrological characteristics, six types of lithofacies are identified in the Es3 shales in the Dongpu Depression: laminated calcareous shales, lenticular calcareous shales, laminated argillaceous shales, massive argillaceous shales, laminated siliceous shales, and massive siliceous shales. Geochemical characteristics of these shales are quite different, as calcareous/laminated shales have higher TOC contents than massive argillaceous and siliceous shales. Interparticle pores, intraparticle pores, organic matter pores and fracture pores are observed in the studied samples, while bitumens were found retaining in well-connected pore network. The N2 adsorption-desorption experiments on samples before and after solvent extraction reveal the different pore structure characteristics in six lithofacies and the occurrence of oil in lacustrine shales. In general, pore volumes within pore diameter range of 1.7–10nm and 10–200nm of samples show increase after solvent extraction, indicating that large and small pores in shales both play important roles in oil retention. Oil retained in shales can be divided as free and heavy fractions, as from the pyrolysis results. In lacustrine shales, larger pores are main storage space for hydrocarbon. Larger pores in different lithologies have similar capacity for free oil retention, while those in calcareous and argillaceous shales are more efficient for heavy oil retention. For both free and heavy oil, small pores in argillaceous shales are efficient for their storage.