Abstract

The processes that drive tissue identity and differentiation remain unclear for most tissue types. So are the gene networks and transcription factors (TF) responsible for the differential structure and function of each particular tissue, and this is particularly true for non model species with incomplete genomic resources. To better understand the regulation of genes responsible for tissue identity in pigs, we have inferred regulatory networks from a meta-analysis of 20 gene expression studies spanning 480 Porcine Affymetrix chips for 134 experimental conditions on 27 distinct tissues. We developed a mixed-model normalization approach with a covariance structure that accommodated the disparity in the origin of the individual studies, and obtained the normalized expression of 12,320 genes across the 27 tissues. Using this resource, we constructed a network, based on the co-expression patterns of 1,072 TF and 1,232 tissue specific genes. The resulting network is consistent with the known biology of tissue development. Within the network, genes clustered by tissue and tissues clustered by site of embryonic origin. These clusters were significantly enriched for genes annotated in key relevant biological processes and confirm gene functions and interactions from the literature. We implemented a Regulatory Impact Factor (RIF) metric to identify the key regulators in skeletal muscle and tissues from the central nervous systems. The normalization of the meta-analysis, the inference of the gene co-expression network and the RIF metric, operated synergistically towards a successful search for tissue-specific regulators. Novel among these findings are evidence suggesting a novel key role of ERCC3 as a muscle regulator. Together, our results recapitulate the known biology behind tissue specificity and provide new valuable insights in a less studied but valuable model species.

Highlights

  • Cell and tissue differentiation proceeds from tightly controlled spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression in the cell

  • 96.48% of the total variation observed in the gene expression data

  • The fact that tissues clustered in an anatomical and functionally sensible manner was attributed to the optimality of the normalization process used in the meta-analysis and anticipates the confidence in the results that emerged in the subsequent analyses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cell and tissue differentiation proceeds from tightly controlled spatial and temporal patterns of gene expression in the cell. It is the synergistic activity of several TF that directs the transcriptional regulation of a particular gene [8] For this reason, the analysis of all TF interactions in a whole network appears a rational approach to better understand the complete picture of transcriptional regulation. The analysis of all TF interactions in a whole network appears a rational approach to better understand the complete picture of transcriptional regulation In such a scenario, tissue-specific transcription factors (TSTF) deserve special attention, as they are the key regulators of tissue specific function and differentiation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.