Abstract
Common examples and exemplary similitudes have been an ancient and quotidian means for acquiring competence in life and discourse performance. But, for philosophical discourse, examples become a problem: our philosophical traditions undervalue examples (in the name of conceptual logic and demonstrative reasoning), and, at the same time, tend to consecrate some kind of paradigm as an exemplary model. In this article we pay attention to the efficacy of constructing intermediate cases. So, we explore semiotic, pragmatic and rhetorical aspects related to the act of setting an example, and we compare examples with another enouncement means like literal quotations, illustrations and metaphors. We also take seriously a certain “paradigmatic turn” in contemporary epistemology, which emphasizes the role of models and shared examples, in scientific investigation. Finally, we discuss the practical difficulties of setting exemplary models in times of exception: when the “unjustifiable” becomes a norm, we can only give our testimony.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
