Abstract

Many populations of threatened American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium) and vulnerable wild leek (Allium tricoccum) have declined and gone extinct because of overharvesting in Canada. We assessed the impact of harvesting on populations of these species in stochastically varying environments and estimated their extinction thresholds and minimum viable populations. With both species we used four transition matrices taken from the literature in stochastic population projections under various harvesting regimes. For American gingseng the mean population growth rate (λ) declined with increasing harvesting rate (h) according to the number of years between harvests (tr), as −0.54 htr−0.90. When plants with more than two leaves are harvested every 5 years, a harvest rate of approximately 30% was sufficient to bring the λ below the equilibrium value of 1.0. Extinction thresholds, the minimum number of plants needed to rebuild a population, varied from 30 to 90 plants, and the minimum viable population size was estimated at 170 plants. Only a dozen populations known in Canada exceed 170 plants, so most populations could not support any harvesting without serious threats to their long‐term persistence. For wild leek, two harvesting strategies were identified from confiscated, illegal harvests from Gatineau Park (Québec): (1) “choosy” harvesters collect fewer but larger bulbs, and (2) “busy” harvesters collect numerous but smaller bulbs. These data allowed simulations of more‐realistic harvesting strategies. The rate of the decline λ along the harvest gradient was faster for wild leek than for ginseng and varied with harvesting strategies. At harvesting rates between 1 and 8% the probability that λ falls below the equilibrium value was less than 5%. The extinction threshold of wild leek was estimated at 140–480 plants and the minimum viable population at 300—1030 plants, according to the threshold chosen. Remnant wild leek populations in Québec rarely contain more than a few hundred plants, indicating the serious threat commercial harvesting represents for this species. For both species we found that the whims of a stochastically varying environment significantly reduce sustainable harvest levels.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.