Abstract

Overfishing of sharks is a global concern, with increasing numbers of species threatened by overfishing. For many sharks, both catch rates and underwater visual surveys have been criticized as indices of abundance. In this context, estimation of population trends using individual demographic rates provides an important alternative means of assessing population status. However, such estimates involve uncertainties that must be appropriately characterized to credibly and effectively inform conservation efforts and management. Incorporating uncertainties into population assessment is especially important when key demographic rates are obtained via indirect methods, as is often the case for mortality rates of marine organisms subject to fishing. Here, focusing on two reef shark species on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, we estimated natural and total mortality rates using several indirect methods, and determined the population growth rates resulting from each. We used bootstrapping to quantify the uncertainty associated with each estimate, and to evaluate the extent of agreement between estimates. Multiple models produced highly concordant natural and total mortality rates, and associated population growth rates, once the uncertainties associated with the individual estimates were taken into account. Consensus estimates of natural and total population growth across multiple models support the hypothesis that these species are declining rapidly due to fishing, in contrast to conclusions previously drawn from catch rate trends. Moreover, quantitative projections of abundance differences on fished versus unfished reefs, based on the population growth rate estimates, are comparable to those found in previous studies using underwater visual surveys. These findings appear to justify management actions to substantially reduce the fishing mortality of reef sharks. They also highlight the potential utility of rigorously characterizing uncertainty, and applying multiple assessment methods, to obtain robust estimates of population trends in species threatened by overfishing.

Highlights

  • There is mounting evidence of widespread, substantial, and ongoing declines in the abundance of shark populations worldwide, coincident with marked rises in global shark catches in the last half-century [1,2,3]

  • In this study, we explore the use of multiple models, and rigorous characterization of uncertainty, to assess mortality and population growth rates of sharks, focusing on two species on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia: the grey reef shark Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos and the whitetip reef shark Triaenodon obesus

  • Rapid declines in many shark species worldwide, coupled with evidence that shark depletion can have substantial, cascading effects on community structure and dynamics, have made assessing the status and trends of shark populations a high priority in conservation biology [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is mounting evidence of widespread, substantial, and ongoing declines in the abundance of shark populations worldwide, coincident with marked rises in global shark catches in the last half-century [1,2,3]. In some cases, these declines have been linked to resultant trophic cascades [1,4]. Evaluating population trends for reef shark species, like that of many sharks, is complicated by several factors that make trends in reported catch and catch rate data unreliable indicators of fishing mortality or abundance. Robust inference of population trends from catch data requires lengthy time series, precluding timely use when decades of high-quality catch records are unavailable [16]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call