Population Dynamics and Harvest Management of the Bonneville Cutthroat Trout Fishery in Bear Lake, Idaho–Utah

Abstract

AbstractLand‐use disturbances and associated losses in habitat quantity and quality negatively affected the Bonneville Cutthroat Trout (BCT) Oncorhynchus clarkii utah population in Bear Lake, Idaho–Utah, in the early 1900s. Bear Lake BCT follow an adfluvial life history strategy, and without access to suitable spawning habitat, the population of wild BCT was nearly extirpated by the early 1950s. In response to this decline, supplementation of the population with hatchery BCT began in 1973. Production of wild BCT was minimal until conservation efforts shifted towards improving fish habitat and access to spawning tributaries. In 2002, only 5% of the population consisted of wild fish; by 2017, nearly 70% of BCT in annual population surveys were wild. As a result, rule changes have been proposed to allow for regulated harvest of wild BCT. However, gaining a comprehensive understanding of the population dynamics of BCT in Bear Lake is critical before changes are made to management of the fishery. The objectives of this study were to describe the population dynamics of wild and hatchery BCT in Bear Lake and evaluate different management options. We evaluated population demographics of hatchery and wild BCT in Bear Lake and used age‐structured population models to assess a variety of management scenarios associated with wild fish harvest regulations (e.g., bag limits). Bonneville Cutthroat Trout grew at relatively fast rates, and females began to mature at age 5. We observed considerable differences in the length and age structure of the hatchery population (i.e., exploited) versus the wild population (i.e., unexploited) of BCT. In general, BCT in Bear Lake were larger and older than Cutthroat Trout O. clarkii in other systems. The current rate of exploitation for hatchery BCT was estimated as 0.27 (i.e., two‐fish daily limit). If the limit were changed to a six‐fish daily limit, the rate of exploitation would be approximately 0.47. A yield‐per‐recruit model evaluating spawning potential ratio indicated that a limit of two wild fish would be a sustainable level of exploitation, whereas a six‐wild‐fish limit would result in recruitment overfishing. This research has provided baseline population dynamics of BCT in Bear Lake that will provide insight for future monitoring efforts. Under current conditions, allowing harvest of either origin BCT in Bear Lake would satisfy angler values while ensuring the persistence of an ecologically and recreationally important population.