Abstract

Ecological conditions shape natural distribution of plants. Populations are denser in optimal habitats but become more fragmented in the areas of suboptimal environmental conditions. Usually, fragmentation increases towards the limits of species distribution. Fragmented populations are often characterised by decreased genetic variation, and this effect is frequent in peripheral populations, mostly due to the reduced effective population size. Interestingly, the genetic consequences of fragmentation seem to be relatively weak in forest trees. Using microsatellite markers, we assessed the impact of population fragmentation on the genetic structure of a European tree species Acer campestre. Within the study area, this medium-size wind-dispersed and insect-pollinated tree reveals a gradual decrease in population density towards the northern range limit. Over the distance of 150 km, we detected the significant decrease in allelic richness, heterozygosity as well as an increase in the rate of population divergence along with latitude. On the other hand, we failed to show that the observed patterns of genetic structure result from the variation in population densities. Moreover, inbreeding levels revealed no association with both density and geographic location, suggesting that pollen limitation does not occur, even at the range margin. As we showed that there is no difference in a dispersal scale between low- and high-density populations in the study species, we argue that the genetic structure is a result of postglacial recolonization. However, unlike many other forest trees, A. campestre showed the sharp latitudinal genetic pattern at a very restricted spatial scale. Limited dispersal and high fragmentation are likely the reasons.

Highlights

  • Besides the climate, one of the most critical factors of the current distribution of plants is historical and current landscape use by humans

  • The results obtained in this study showed that populations of A. campestre located closer to the northern margin of the natural distribution are characterised by lower genetic variation and higher divergence rates

  • This pattern is in line with the theoretical predictions for the ‘central-marginal’ theory, that peripheral populations experience more genetic drift leading to reduced genetic variation as compared with more central populations (Vucetich & Waite 2003; Eckert et al 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most critical factors of the current distribution of plants is historical and current landscape use by humans. Exploitation of natural resources often causes habitat fragmentation, limiting plant distribution and increasing the risk of local extinction. Ecological conditions shape natural distribution of plants (Brown 1984; Austin 2007). Population fragmentation often leads to reduced effective population size (Young et al 1996; Vucetich & Waite 2003). In effect, fragmented populations are generally characterised by decreased genetic variation (Leimu et al 2006). It is well recognised in peripheral populations as compared with central ones (the ‘central-marginal’ genetic pattern) The risk of negative consequences of fragmentation is related primarily to the dispersal capability

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call