Abstract

Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, models of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were established and evaluated. First of all, the evaluation indexes of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were analyzed and determined. Then, significance testing, correlation analysis, and three feature selection algorithms (Hierarchical clustering, Lasso, and Stepwise regression) were used to screen photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and environmental parameters. Based on this, four machine learning methods, BP neural network regression (BPR), extreme learning machine regression (ELMR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR) were used to predict the flood resistance of poplar. The results show that random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) have high precision. On the test set, the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.8351 and 0.6864, the root mean square error (RMSE) is 0.2016 and 0.2780, and the mean absolute error (MAE) is 0.1782 and 0.2031, respectively. Therefore, random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) can be given priority to predict poplar flood resistance.

Highlights

  • Natural disasters are inherently a phenomenon that has adverse consequences for society (Paprotny et al, 2018)

  • The Division of Test Set and Training Set Before establishing the machine learning regression model, the poplar varieties were divided into training set and test set according to the ratio of 4:1

  • The colored columns correspond to the four machine learning methods of BP neural network regression (BPR), Extreme learning machine regression (ELMR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR), respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Natural disasters are inherently a phenomenon that has adverse consequences for society (Paprotny et al, 2018). It damages the living environment and life of human beings. Many studies want to build a system for predicting flood risk (Alfieri et al, 2017; ShafizadehMoghadam et al, 2018; Choubin et al, 2019; Khosravi et al, 2019), and a variety of machine learning methods are used in these studies. Khosravi et al (2019) adopted three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS, and SAW) and two Machine Learning methods (NBT and NB) to test the flood sensitivity modeling of the Ningdu River Basin in China. Predicting flood risk cannot substantially reduce the life and economic losses of human society.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call