Poor survival of dialysis patients with unhealed wounds because of critical limb ischemia: Limb salvage and survival requires wound healing.

Abstract

Maintenance of blood flow in the wound area is required to heal wounds of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in dialysis patients. However, many dialysis patients have both a stenotic lesion in below-knee blood vessels and a cardiovascular event as complications, and thus, it may be difficult to ensure sufficient blood flow. Therefore, many deaths occur because of problems with wound healing. The aim of this study is to identify the optimal treatment, including revascularisation and amputation, from the perspective of wound healing by analysing the survival of hemodialysis patients with CLI who had healed or unhealed wounds in a lower extremity. The subjects were 52 patients who received maintenance dialysis at our clinic, including 27 with healed CLI wounds and 25 with unhealed CLI wounds. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the effect of an unhealed wound on mortality. The mean follow-up period was 1.7 ± 1.1 years. In the unhealed wound group, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 48%, 20%, and 12%, respectively. The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the unhealed wound group compared with the healed wound group (12% vs 63%, P = .0002 by log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, unhealed CLI wounds had a significant independent association with mortality (hazard ratio 3.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-8.77, P = .0054). In this study, the 3-year survival rate suggested a significantly poorer prognosis of hemodialysis patients with unhealed CLI wounds compared with those with healed wounds. An unhealed wound is an independent risk factor for mortality in hemodialysis patients with CLI.