Abstract

Humans have never been healthier, wealthier or more numerous. Yet, present success may be at the cost of future prosperity and in some places, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, poverty persists. Livestock keepers, especially pastoralists, are over-represented among the poor. Poverty has been mainly attributed to a lack of access, whether to goods, education or enabling institutions. More recent insights suggest ecosystems may influence poverty and the self-reinforcing mechanisms that constitute poverty traps in more subtle ways. The plausibility of zoonoses as poverty traps is strengthened by landmark studies on disease burden in recent years. While in theory, endemic zoonoses are best controlled in the animal host, in practice, communities are often left to manage disease themselves, with the focus on treatment rather than prevention. We illustrate this with results from a survey on health costs in a pastoral ecosystem. Epidemic zoonoses are more likely to elicit official responses, but these can have unintended consequences that deepen poverty traps. In this context, a systems understanding of disease control can lead to more effective and pro-poor disease management. We illustrate this with an example of how a system dynamics model can help optimize responses to Rift Valley fever outbreaks in Kenya by giving decision makers real-time access to the costs of the delay in vaccinating. In conclusion, a broader, more ecological understanding of poverty and of the appropriate responses to the diseases of poverty can contribute to improved livelihoods for livestock keepers in Africa.This article is part of the themed issue ‘One Health for a changing world: zoonoses, ecosystems and human well-being’.

Highlights

  • Humans have never been healthier, wealthier or more numerous

  • In a world that is ever wealthier, why do so many livestock keepers remain poor? This paper examines poverty among livestock keepers with a focus on pastoralists in Africa, a group of livestock keepers who rank among the richest in terms of animals kept per household but among the worst-off in terms of human development

  • We focus on infectious disease as a poverty trap

Read more

Summary

Poor livestock keepers

Livestock production constitutes around 40% of global agricultural gross domestic product, but households dependent on livestock, especially small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists, are over-represented among poor households. Pastoral systems have low levels of productivity in physical terms due to their dependence on often poor quality and scarce local resources and limited access to purchased inputs, resulting in both low levels of overall inputs used and output produced They are often characterized by high poverty, chronic conflict and low governance. (The report explores the biases of development professionals finding they often interpret data differently depending on the frame and have little idea about the opinions of the poor people they aim to help.) There is a rich literature on pastoralist societies and culture, and how failure to understand these has led to the failure of development projects as well as widespread misperceptions that pastoralism is backwards and environmentally damaging [21]. Not without controversy [34], an understanding of genetics is transforming our understanding of health and disease and might mediate some relations between ecosystems and social outcomes [35,36]

Disease as a poverty trap
Zoonoses as important diseases among poor people
Escaping the poverty trap of endemic zoonoses
When official responses to disease deepen the poverty trap of zoonoses
Conclusion
12. Steffen W et al 2015 Planetary boundaries: guiding
Findings
52. Havelaar AH et al 2015 World Health Organization
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.