Abstract

New thermoplastic nonsegmented thiopolyurethanes were obtained from the low-melting aliphatic–aromatic thiodiols 4,4′-bis(2-hydroxyethylthiomethyl)benzophenone (BHEB), 4,4′-bis(3-hydroxypropylthiomethyl)benzophenone (BHPB), and 4,4′-bis(6-hydroxyhexylthiomethyl)benzenophenone(BHHB) as well as hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), both by melt and solution polymerization with dibutyltin dilaurate as the catalyst. The effect of various solvents on molecular-weight values was examined. The polymers with the highest reduced viscosities (0.63–0.88 dL/g) were obtained when the polymerization was carried out in a solution of tetrachloroethane, N,N-dimethylacetamide, and N,N-dimethylacetamide or N,N-dimethylformamide for BHEB-, BHPB-, and BHHB-derived polyurethanes, respectively. These polymers with a partially crystalline structure showed glass-transition temperatures (Tg) in the range of −1 to 39 °C, melting temperatures (Tm) in the range of 107 to 124 °C, and thermal stabilities up to 230 to 240 °C. The BHEB-derived polyurethane is a low-elasticity material with high tensile strength (ca. 50 MPa), whereas the BHPB- and BHHB-derived polyurethanes are more elastic, showing yield stress at approximately 16 MPa. We also obtained segmented polyurethanes by using BHHB, HDI, and 20 to 80 mol % poly(oxytetramethylene) glycol (PTMG) of M̄n = 1000 as the soft segment. These are high-molecular thermoplastic elastomers that show a partially crystalline structure. Thermal properties were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry. The increase in PTMG content decreases the definite Tg and increases the solubility of the polymers. These segmented polyurethanes exhibit the definite Tg (−67 to −62 °C) nearly independent of the hard-segment content up to approximately 50 wt %, indicating the existence of mainly phase-separated soft and hard segments. Shore A/D hardness and tensile properties were also determined. As the PTMG content increases, the hardness, modulus of elasticity, and tensile strength decrease, whereas elongation at break increases. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 37: 4140–4150, 1999

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call