Abstract

In contrast to currently used materials, membranes for the treatment of bone defects should actively promote regeneration of bone tissue beyond their physical barrier function. What is more, both material properties and biological features of membranes should be easily adaptable to meet the needs of particular therapeutic applications. Therefore, the role of preparation methods (non-solvent-induced phase separation and thermal-induced phase separation) of poly(ε-caprolactone)-based membranes and their modification with gel-derived bioactive glass (BG) particles of two different sizes (<45 and <3 μm) in modulating material morphology, polymer matrix crystallinity, surface wettability, kinetics of in vitro bioactivity and also osteoblast response was investigated. Both surfaces of membranes were characterised in terms of their properties. Our results indicated a possibility to modulate microstructure (pore size ranging from submicron to hundreds of micrometres), wettability (from hydrophobic to fully wettable surface) and polymer crystallinity (from 19 to 60%) in a wide range by the use of various preparation methods and different BG particle sizes. Obtained composite membranes showed excellent in vitro hydroxyapatite forming ability after incubation in simulated body fluid. Here we demonstrated that bioactive layer formation on the surface of membranes occurred through ACP–OCP–CDHA–HCA transformation, that mimic in vivo bone biomineralization process. Composite membranes supported human osteoblast proliferation, stimulated cell differentiation and matrix mineralization. We proved that kinetics of bioactivity process and also osteoinductive properties of membranes can be easily modulated with the use of proposed variables. This brings new opportunities to obtain multifunctional membranes for bone regeneration with tunable physicochemical and biological properties.

Highlights

  • Tissue engineering (TE) offers a promising approach to repair damaged tissues and/or to promote new tissue growth using highly porous biomaterials, cells and signalling molecules [1]

  • GS surface of PCL/ A2 \ 45 μm/thermal-induced phase separation (TIPS) was mainly consisted of glass particles, which was confirmed by energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) analysis, indicating intensive sedimentation of \45 μm bioactive glass (BG) particles in polymer solution during preparation process

  • The results showed that osteoblasts cultured on composite membranes obtained with both TIPS and non-solvent-induced phase separation (NIPS) methods showed significantly higher Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity compared to cells in contact with the polymer PCL/TIPS and PCL/NIPS membranes, as well as the tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS), for which the activity was on similar level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tissue engineering (TE) offers a promising approach to repair damaged tissues and/or to promote new tissue growth using highly porous biomaterials, cells and signalling molecules [1]. Porous membranes are mainly used for guided tissue/bone regeneration (GTR/GBR), to prevent connective tissue ingrowth into the bone defects and to maintain a suitable space for bone regeneration processes [3, 4]. Another application for porous membranes is at the interfaces between soft and hard tissues, e.g. cartilage/bone interface [5]. Materials for bone tissue engineering (BTE) should possess bone-bonding ability, as well as osteoconductive/osteoinductive properties [8, 9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call