Abstract
Objective To demonstrate similar improvement in pediatric sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) as determined by polysomnography (PSG) with microdebrider-assisted partial intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (PITA) versus Bovie electrocautery complete tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A). Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 30 children found to have SDB by PSG who have undergone either PITA (15 participants) or T&A (15 participants) as treatment were evaluated with standardized history and physical examination and unattended home overnight PSG. Results Median change in apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) was 1.7 (−4.9 to 29.8) for the PITA group and 2.3 (−10.9 to 64.1) for the T&A group, although there was substantially more variability in the T&A group. A mixed linear model evaluating the relation of surgical group with change in AHI demonstrated no significant differences in group means ( F[1,13] = 0.31, P = .590) but the variances differed significantly (residual likelihood ratio chi-square = 5.24, df = 1, P = .022). Five of 15 (33%) PITA patients and 4 of 15 (27%) T&A patients had postoperative AHI scores of ≤5; this difference was not statistically significant (Fisher exact test P = 1.000). There was no significant interaction or substantial confounding effect of age, sex, race, preoperative tonsil size, preoperative AHI, or body mass index in the model relating surgery type to reduction of postoperative AHI to ≤5. Conclusions Our study demonstrates no clinically or statistically significant differences in PSG and clinical outcomes between PITA and T&A for treatment of pediatric SDB in otherwise healthy children.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.