Abstract

Protein crystallography is the most widely used method for determining the molecular structure of proteins and obtaining structural information on protein–ligand complexes at the atomic level. As the structure determines the functions and properties of a protein, crystallography is of immense importance for nearly all research fields related to biochemistry. However, protein crystallography suffers from some major drawbacks, whereby the unpredictability of the crystallization process represents the main bottleneck. Crystallization is still more or less a ‘trial and error’ based procedure, and therefore, very time and resource consuming. Many strategies have been developed in the past decades to improve or enable the crystallization of proteins, whereby the use of so-called additives, which are mostly small molecules that make proteins more amenable to crystallization, is one of the most convenient and successful methods. Most of the commonly used additives are, however, restricted to particular crystallization conditions or groups of proteins. Therefore, a more universal additive addressing a wider range of proteins and being applicable to a broad spectrum of crystallization conditions would represent a significant advance in the field of protein crystallography. In recent years, polyoxometalates (POMs) emerged as a promising group of crystallization additives due to their unique structures and properties. In this regard, the tellurium-centered Anderson–Evans polyoxotungstate [TeW6O24]6− (TEW) showed its high potential as crystallization additive. In this lecture text, the development of POMs as tools in protein crystallography are discussed with a special focus on the so far most successful cluster TEW.

Highlights

  • Abbreviations Å Ångström AbPPO4 Polyphenol oxidase from Agaricus bisporus asymmetric unit (ASU) Asymmetric unit CgAUS1 Aurone synthase from Coreopsis grandiflora hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) Hen egg white lysozyme IR Infrared kDa Kilodalton

  • Structural biology is concerned with the molecular structure and dynamics of biological macromolecules, proteins and nucleic acids

  • X-ray crystallography is currently the most commonly applied method for macromolecular structure determination as accurate molecular structures can be obtained reliably for very large proteins or even molecular complexes (> 100 kDa) at atomic resolution. This is reflected in the Protein Data Bank (PDB, http://www.rcsb. org), where ~ 90% of all deposited protein structures were elucidated by X-ray crystallography

Read more

Summary

10 Page 2 of 27

ChemTexts (2018) 4:10 areas of life sciences as proteins are involved in the most basic processes of life. X-ray crystallography is currently the most commonly applied method for macromolecular structure determination as accurate molecular structures can be obtained reliably for very large proteins or even molecular complexes (> 100 kDa) at atomic resolution. The process of X-ray crystallography consists in general of five major steps, namely obtaining sufficient amounts of the target protein, protein purification, crystallization, data collection and structure determination (Fig. 1). The probability of observing diffraction in a certain direction is proportional to the amplitude of the resulting wave (structure factor F) This phenomenon of X-ray diffraction by crystals was discovered by Max T. von Laue (1879–1960), for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1914 [7].

10 Page 4 of 27
10 Page 8 of 27
10 Page 10 of 27
10 Page 12 of 27
10 Page 14 of 27
10 Page 16 of 27
10 Page 20 of 27
10 Page 22 of 27
Concluding remarks
10 Page 26 of 27
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call