Abstract

Polynuclearity and polycentricity are spatial phenomena which overlap each other in the context of urban sprawl, and this sometimes hinders the possibility of clearly distinguishing the two. Hence, the basic goal of the article is to indicate the differences between polycentricity and polynuclearity as well as their conceptualization and operationalization as urban sprawl features. The article indicates that the main differences between polycentricity and polynuclearity boil down to functional connections. However, empirical exemplification was made in relation to the agglomeration of Cracow, Poland using an urban morphology approach based on 1 km2 square grids. Among the conclusions, it can be found that the identification of the central core is an important stage of research. If at least two cores appear then polynuclearity is identified and then polycentricity can be further identified. Testing of four mathematical approaches to identifying the central core showed that the most accurate results are given by the 95th percentile, i.e., the grids within the 95th percentile of building density qualify for the central core. It is also necessary to remove grids with extremely high building density from the analyses.

Highlights

  • The choice of the Cracow area resulted from the validation of the results of building density in all delimited urban sprawl areas studied by Lityński and Hołuj [64]

  • The following centroid abundance ranges of the highest square density were adopted: 75th, 80th, 90th, and 95th percentile, which were marked with the reference numbers: P75%, P80%, P90%, P95%

  • The main difference between polycentricity and polynuclearity relates to the functional approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Urban sprawl is a spatial phenomenon around which scientific debate has been ongoing for a number of years. Urban sprawl is a term that was introduced into scientific debate in 1937 by E. Draper during an urban conference in the United States and concerned a specific way of building suburban space [1]. The term has spread to many disciplines [2]. Until the end of the 1990s, studies focus on the specific features of suburbs’

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.