Abstract
The crystal structures of two polymorphs of the title compound [Pbca and Pna21; Jasinski & Woudenberg (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 107–109] were analysed. Packing energies and indices were compared. Molecules in the two forms show a slight conformational difference; both conformers were packed in some of the most frequent space groups for organic molecules (P21, P21/c, P212121 and Pna21) using a computer program for crystal structure generation and prediction (PROMET3). The results of such calculations are used to provide tentative explanations for the preference of the two conformers for centrosymmetric and non-centrosymmetric space groups. Several comments on general problems encountered in crystal structure prediction are also presented, concerning in particular the multi-minima structure of the potential energy hypersurface.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
