Polymerization of methyl methacrylate with butyllithium–diethylzinc complex

Abstract

AbstractThe low‐temperature polymerization of methyl methacrylate initiated with butyllithium–diethylzinc has been studied in toluene and in toluene–tetrahydrofuran and toluene–dioxane mixtures in various proportions. The polymerization process is typically anionic; it is characterized by a very rapid initiation reaction, and the absence of termination and chain transfer reactions, the molecular weight increasing proportionally with the degree of conversion. With toluene as a solvent, the polymer chains are associated, as is shown by viscometric measurements; moreover the polymers produced are highly polydisperse (Mv/Mn = 5.4). The kinetics are very complicated and vary with the range of the catalyst and monomer concentrations. In pure toluene in the presence of the organometallic complex, butyllithium–diethylzinc, the monomer addition is more stereospecific than when butyllithium alone is used as catalyst. By adding tetrahydrofuran to the reaction mixture, the polymer chain association disappears; concomitantly the stereochemical structure of the polymer changes from an isotactic to a mainly syndiotactic configuration. In toluene–tetrahydrofuran mixtures containing from 1 to 10 vol.‐% tetrahydrofuran, the kinetics of polymerization can easily be interpreted by assuming the presence of two propagating reactive species which are in equilibrium with each other: the ion pair and the THF‐solvated ion pair. The energy of activation of propagation for the free ion pair is equal to 7.5 kcal./mole; for the solvated ion pair a value of 5.5 kcal./mole was found, including the solvation enthalpy of the organometal with tetrahydrofuran. The existence of any relation between the reactivity of the propagating species and the tactic incorporation of the monomeric units has been discussed. The polymerization in mixtures of toluene–dioxane is intermediate between that in pure toluene and that in toluene–HF mixtures; the reaction mechanism however cannot be interpreted with the usual kinetic scheme. The experimental data concerning the rate dependence on catalyst and monomer concentrations are briefly summarized.