Abstract

Biomaterials constructed exclusively of sintered microspheres have great potential in tissue engineering scaffold applications, offering the ability to create shape-specific scaffolds with precise controlled release yet to be matched by traditional additive manufacturing methods. The problem is that these microsphere-based scaffolds are limited in their stiffness for applications such as bone regeneration. Our vision to solve this problem was borne from a hierarchical structure perspective, focusing on the individual unit of the structure: the microsphere itself. In a core–shell approach, we envisioned a stiff core to create a stiff microsphere unit, with a polymeric shell that would enable sintering to the other microsphere units. Therefore, the current study provided a comparison of macroscopic biomaterials built on either polymer microspheres or polymer-coated hard glass microspheres. Identical polycaprolactone (PCL) polymer solutions were used to fabricate microspheres and as a thin coating on soda lime glass microspheres (hard phase). The materials were characterized as loose particles and as scaffolds via scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, Raman spectroscopy, mechanical testing, and a live/dead analysis with human umbilical cord-derived Wharton’s jelly cells. The elastic modulus of the scaffolds with the thinly coated hard phase was about five times higher with glass microspheres (up to about 25 MPa) than pure polymer microspheres, while retaining the structure, cell adhesion, and chemical properties of the PCL polymer. This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the ability to achieve at least a five-fold increase in macroscopic stiffness via altering the core microsphere units with a core–shell approach.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call