Abstract
The study investigated the polygraph examination of the Philippine National Police (PNP) Crime Laboratory – Region 10. The study applied the descriptive method with the use of a questionnaire involving 50 respondents with different professions or fields of specialization, distinctively: Precinct Commanders; Criminal Investigators; Judges; Public Prosecutors; and Public Attorneys. The questionnaire was administered to the Precinct Commanders, Criminal Investigators, Judges, Public Prosecutors and Public Attorneys in Cagayan de Oro City for the effectiveness of the PNP Crime Laboratory polygraph examination service. The study found out that the polygraph examination result was not accepted as evidence in Court or proving capable in convicting a suspect. However, most of the respondents agreed that the polygraph examination is a big help in the police investigation. The researchers believed that the Court must stress the information that even if the polygraph result is not acceptable as evidence in a Court trial, it is still capable and helpful in identifying and eliminating suspects during an investigation. The researchers also deemed that coordination between policemen and polygraph examiners, posed a high possibility in achieving the goals of the Philippine National Police. Keywords - Polygraph Examination, Court, Philippine National Police, Crime Laboratories, descriptive design, Region 10, Mindanao.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.