Polyethylene glycol‐mediated direct gene transfer in Nicotiana spp.

Abstract

Direct gene transfer to protoplasts is a widespread experimental procedure. In this review, it is discussed in relation to the fate and expression of transforming DNA and its genetic transmission upon integration, and expression (in)stability during successive meiotic generations. The results suggest that the major differences between Nicotiana plumbaginifolia and N. tabacum were not in DNA uptake but rather in the specific fate of the transforming DNA. Differences between integrative transformation versus transient gene expression are discussed. Transient gene expression experiments with cotransformed independent constructs enable accurate assays of gene activity modulation, including both activation and repression. The study of the time of integration of foreign DNA using haploid mesophyll protoplasts showed that foreign DNA integration took place during the first two division cycles of the protoplasts. Most of the transfomants inherited the foreign genes as a monogenic trait: N. plumbaginifolia exhibited a higher proportion of multiple insertions compared with N. tabacum. Furthermore, gene integration occurs as a random process. Compared to ‘simple’ transformation, cotransformation with independent constructs showed a higher level of rearrangement of the inserted DNA. Foreign gene transmission, followed through different generations, indicated that inactivation of the inserted gene could happen through a variety of processes. These results open up a series of questions concerning the applied aspects of direct gene transfer to plants.