Abstract
ABSTRACT Healthcare financing is attracting widespread interest due to the coronavirus pandemic. This study aims to assess federal public healthcare financing in Brazil in the light of a legal framework for minimum spending on health and the effects of economic cycles and crises. A literature review showed that public healthcare funding should increase during crises, which is contrary to what fiscal austerity policies postulate. Different formats of fiscal rules for minimum spending on health are analyzed based on the historical evolution of healthcare financing in Brazil. A simulation shows that linking this spending rule to GDP (and especially to current revenue) gives a pro-cyclical character to healthcare financing, which can make it difficult to guarantee health rights in times of crisis. Thus, a debate arises about the need to revise the rule set by the Constitutional Amendment 95/2016 (EC no. 95/2016) and to establish a parameter for growth in public healthcare expenditure that eliminates its pro-cyclical characteristic and enables the needs of the country to be met after the pandemic.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
