Abstract

We use the optimal foraging theory to study coexistence between two plant species and a generalist pollinator. We compare conditions for plant coexistence for non-adaptive vs. adaptive pollinators that adjust their foraging strategy to maximize fitness. When pollinators have fixed preferences, we show that plant coexistence typically requires both weak competition between plants for resources (e.g., space or nutrients) and pollinator preferences that are not too biased in favour of either plant. We also show how plant coexistence is promoted by indirect facilitation via the pollinator. When pollinators are adaptive foragers, pollinator’s diet maximizes pollinator’s fitness measured as the per capita population growth rate. Simulations show that this has two conflicting consequences for plant coexistence. On the one hand, when competition between pollinators is weak, adaptation favours pollinator specialization on the more profitable plant which increases asymmetries in plant competition and makes their coexistence less likely. On the other hand, when competition between pollinators is strong, adaptation promotes generalism, which facilitates plant coexistence. In addition, adaptive foraging allows pollinators to survive sudden loss of the preferred plant host, thus preventing further collapse of the entire community.

Highlights

  • Data Availability Statement: The data used by figures was generated using computer code which is provided as supplementary information

  • For this scenario combined initial plant densities are fixed doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160076.g005 (P1(0) + P2(0) = 50). We contrast these predictions with the situation where population densities are fixed, i.e., when population dynamics are not considered and pollinator preferences are at the evolutionarily stable foraging strategy (ESS)

  • We studied a two-plant–one-pollinator interaction module assuming that pollinator preferences for plants are either fixed or adaptive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data Availability Statement: The data used by figures was generated using computer code which is provided as supplementary information. As pollinator population density will increase, competition for resources among pollinators will increase too [13], and the IFD predicts that they become generalists, which promotes plant coexistence (Fig 1d). We calculate the pollinator’s evolutionarily stable foraging strategy (ESS) at fixed plant and pollinator population densities, and we study plant coexistence assuming pollinators instantaneously track their ESS. This case corresponds to time scale separation where population dynamics operate on a slow time scale, while pollinator foraging preferences operate on a fast time scale. On the other hand competition for plant resources among pollinators promotes generalism over specialization, which can prevent the loss of pollination services for some plants and promote coexistence

Methods
À P2 þ c1P1 K2
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call