Abstract

Political rewritings of the Our Father prayer in four Afrikaans poems. The utilisation of religious elements is a prominent trend in Afrikaans poetry − often in service of the political struggle, for example during the apartheid years. In this article four rewritings of the “Our Father” prayer are examined, using Linda Hutcheon’s theory of parody, as discussed in (among others), her pioneering work, “A theory of parody” (2000). For Hutcheon, parody does not necessarily imply ridiculing a previous text. According to her well-known definition, parody is “ironic transcontextualization, is repetition with difference. A critical distance is implied between the backgrounded text being parodied and the new incorporating work, a distance usually signaled by irony.” The rewritings of the “Our Father” by Jan Blom (Breyten Breytenbach), Ronnie Belcher and André Letoit (Koos Kombuis) are distinct examples of ironic inversion, while in Hans du Plessis’s poem (in Griqua Afrikaans) the irony is less obvious and the critique (if any) more subdued. As Hutcheon explains and motivates, parody does not always take place at the expense of the parodied text. Thus the parodical rewritings of the “Our Father” need not necessarily be seen as destructive and belittling of the prayer itself, but as critically constructive vis-à-vis the Christian community.

Highlights

  • Die benutting van religieuse elemente is ’n besonder opvallende tendens in die Afrikaanse poësie − dikwels in diens van politieke verset, soos tydens die apartheidsjare

  • There is an unexpected emergence of religious motifs and themes in both deconstruction and postmodernism

  • A critical distance is implied between the backgrounded text being parodied and the new incorporating work, a distance usually signaled by irony

Read more

Summary

Inleiding

In hierdie afdeling word ’n bespreking van die Ons(e) Vader-gebed gebied ten einde die grondslag te lê vir die bespreking van die geselekteerde gedigte. Wanneer daar na die belangrikheid van die Ons(e) Vader vir Christene gekyk word, is dit te verstane dat hierdie gebed as ’n voertuig vir parodiëring gebruik word. Hugh (1951:7) skryf dat die Ons(e) Vader-gebed as ’n samevatting van die totale Christelike evangelie beskou kan word. Dit lyk asof die digters wat in hierdie artikel ter sprake kom nie noodwendig van God verwag om die nood in die gemeenskap te verlig nie, maar Christene eerder aan hulle verantwoordelikheid teenoor die gemeenskap wil herinner. Crosby (1977:2) skryf: “For a Franciscan to pray the Our Father in a world marked by the grave sin of social injustice, there are grave economic, political, and social consequences.” Waetjen (1999:xi) beklemtoon voorts die sosiale verantwoordelikheid wat vir hedendaagse Christene met die Ons(e) Vader gepaard gaan. Vervolgens word die aanhef bespreek, en daarna die ses afsonderlike bedes

Die parodie in die postmodernisme
Die aanhef
Die U-bedes
Die ons-bedes
Ronnie Belcher se herskrywing
Hans du Plessis se herskrywing
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.