Abstract

The history of synfuels suggests that sustaining long-term research and development is difficult for a political and bureaucratic system that demands a ready-arsenal of technological quick-fixes. The authors point out that synfuels has become a perennial panacea that never seems to quite pan out. There is a persistent unwillingness to invest in long-term research, while more modest demonstration programs could perfect viable options. After reviewing three major supply interruptions, the authors conclude that if there is likely to be additional short-term supply-related shocks as well as the certainty of mid-term depletion of our liquid and gaseous fuels, then the US must be prepared for the development of a very inefficient synthetic fuels industry. It is important, then, to consider how to reduce technical risk before the demonstration stage. 23 references.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call