Abstract
This paper studies when and why firms prefer more direct forms of state capture (i.e. without intermediaries, such as patronage or appointments to the bureaucracy) to more indirect ones (e.g. lobbying). Using a novel database on contractual arrangements between politicians, political brokers and businessmen in Benin, we find that an increase in political uncertainty is associated with an increase in direct forms of capture. We rationalize our findings through a principal-agent model under political uncertainty. Firms induce market distortions by making transfers to incumbents. Direct capture acts as an insurance for the firm, guaranteeing that its paid for distortions are kept in place even when the incumbent is displaced. We structurally estimate our model and show that policies thought to decrease state capture, such as improved bureaucrat selection, can have little to no effect once substitution towards indirect control is accounted for.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.