Abstract
This study is to analyze the impact of Political Border Disputes in the City of Kupang and Kupang Regency. Regional boundary disputes that occurred in the Nasipanaf region began since the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1996 Establishment of the Kupang Second Level Regional Municipality. on April 25, but the territorial borders were not taken seriously by the Government. The physical boundary between Kupang City and Kupang Regency on the ground is that there are still unclear boundary points, especially in the Nasipanaf region between Kelurahan Penfui and Desa Baumata Barat which have not been agreed between the two parties. The method used in this research is a qualitative descriptive method based on case studies as the sample in this study there are people from both the research locus and the government as the authorized party for decision making. The findings obtained in this study indicate that there has been a clash between residents resulting in conflict over the past few years. In addition, administrative issues also become a problem for people who are in the border area and infrastructure development also influence in the dispute over this area.
Highlights
The boundaries between Kupang City and Kupang Regency physically in the field there are still unclear boundary points, especially in the Nasipanaf area that has not been agreed upon between the two parties
For the affirmation referred to, the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara proposed to the Minister of Home Affairs to be stipulated in the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation, but the submitted documents were returned to the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara in the field that the submitted documents were incomplete because there was no decision/ confirmation from the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara. regarding the boundaries of Kupang Regency and Kupang City (The decree referred to is in accordance with Minister of Home Affairs Regulation number 1 of 2006, while the mandate of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation number 76 of 2012, in dealing with regional boundary issues between regions, it is enough with an affirmation made by the Governor)
According to the law on regional formation, Kupang City is the capital for two autonomous regions, namely Kupang City itself and Kupang Regency, but in October 2010 Kupang Regency moved the capital to Oelamasi
Summary
The boundaries between Kupang City and Kupang Regency physically in the field there are still unclear boundary points, especially in the Nasipanaf area that has not been agreed upon between the two parties. The problem that occured was a technical boundary problem that came from the regional formation law and the physical form in the field, but it was more complex than it, so that an agreement between the two parties has not been reached until now. In this case, the issue of confirming territorial boundaries is a protracted institutional conflict between Kupang City and Kupang Regency governments. For the affirmation referred to, the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara proposed to the Minister of Home Affairs to be stipulated in the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation, but the submitted documents were returned to the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara in the field that the submitted documents were incomplete because there was no decision/ confirmation from the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara. regarding the boundaries of Kupang Regency and Kupang City (The decree referred to is in accordance with Minister of Home Affairs Regulation number 1 of 2006, while the mandate of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation number 76 of 2012, in dealing with regional boundary issues between regions, it is enough with an affirmation made by the Governor)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
