Abstract
Apparently, political representation is an elusive phenomenon. ‚In spite of many centuries of theoretical effort‘, says Heinz Eulau, ‘we cannot say what representation is’1. Philip Converse and Roy Pierce are equally harsh in their judgements and talk about the literature on the concept of political representation as ‘riddled with confusion’2. Hanna Pitkin, the author of the modern classic, The Concept of Representation (1967), is also very critical when she summarizes the literature. Old conceptual pillars like authorization and accountability she finds formalistic and devoid of content: ‘Neither (concept) can tell us anything about what goes on during representation, how a representative ought to act... whether he has represented well or badly.’ 3 Notions such as that legislatures should be mirror images of populations (descriptive representation) and more lofty concepts like that of symbolic representation are dismissed by Pitkin as unrealistic and incomplete.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
