Abstract
We investigated the role of affect in the political perceptions of a sample of Australian university students (N = 185). Following the procedure of Abelson, Kinder, Peters, and Fiske (1982), we compared affective and cognitive appraisals of three Australian politicians (Bob Hawke, John Howard, and John Bjelke-Petersen) and examined their respective influence on favorability judgments. Affective appraisals were less consistent than cognitive appraisals, and affect was a significant predictor of favorability, with certain idiosyncratic exceptions. Bjelke-Petersen elicited comparatively consistent affective reactions. The affective reactions elicited by Hawke were inconsequential to favorability. Two dimensions of negative affect for Hawke revealed a differential impact of negative affect on favorability.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
